espn fpi accuracy
Because of the level of detail in each simulation and the exhaustive process in building the model (see details on process here) we are confident that it will be remain of the most accurate systems out there for the upcoming season. -- Prior performance is built off the framework of expected points added. You can reach him at Mark@BroBible.com. If Vegas ever published the power rankings it uses to set its lines, they would likely look quite a lot like FPI. For example, if a team wins by an average of 10 points per game, it could be that plus-seven of that is offense, plus-four is defense and minus-one is special teams. ESPN cant even explain it. Win percentage is hardly better than flipping a coin for each bowl game. Last, the play success is either like Bill Connellys success rate or expected points used by ESPN. Beyond generating FPI, programming in the logic to determine . It is important to note that prior seasons information never completely disappears, because it has been proved to help with prediction accuracy even at the end of a season. Western Kentucky: 85.7% (Was 80.4%) North Alabama: 99.7% (Remained the same) Houston is the greatest challenge remaining on the official schedule according to ESPN FPI. 11-8, 7th Big 12. Each teams FPI rating is composed of predictive offensive, defensive, and special teams value, as measured by a function of expected points added (EPA). Since the offense started in a situation with +0.3 expected points, they had +1.0 EPA for this play. Therefore, other information included in the preseason ratings include: previous years' efficiencies for each unit, number of returning starters (on offense and defense), coaching/coordinator/quarterback changes and quarterback injuries. As noted, there are four components to the preseason rating: prior performance, returning starters, recruiting rankings and coaching tenure. I wrote this regarding FPI months ago, and it still is true. AZ, CO, CT, IL, IN, IA, KS, LA, (select parishes), MD, MI, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, TN, VA, WV, WY, CA-ONT only.Eligibility restrictions apply. If it is done correctly, the calculations should converge somewhere near reality, but we have evidence that FPI is useless. Looking at the last four seasons, that percentage has risen to 77 percent, and in games that FPI and Vegas differed, the FPI favorite won 55 percent of the time. These four factors are combined to make the final rankings. -. Can Rudy Gobert-less Jazz keep pesky Nuggets off the glass? Can Thunder's struggling D slow a better-than-ever Warriors offense? College football rankings can help you answer these questions, but only if you find the right ones. At one point, FPI had Mississippi as the best team in the nation, and it is currently ranking Southern Cal as the sixth best team in the nation, despite their 3-3 record. Be sure to follow him on Twitter @ItIsMarkHarris. ESPN's FPI metric projects the Noles to win 6.1 games and a 65.4 percent chance of winning six games and going to a bowl game. On paper, that would seem fine. [1], In 2016, FPI favorites won 73 percent of games in the regular season, which was a higher success rate than the Las Vegas closing lines.[2]. For example, Brian Burke of ESPN has used NFL play by play data to determine that 1st and 10 from a teams 20 yard line gives +0.3 expected points. Before the 2015 season, Connellys rankings depended on only success rate and points per play, which gives the term S&P. Each teams schedule is simulated 10,000 times to produce season-level outcomes such as each teams chance to win its conference, enter bowls undefeated and make a bowl game. Let's go ahead and address the elephant in the room as the one outlier Oklahoma has the easiest schedule of all teams in the Big 12. Barking Carnival has last year's pre-season FPI on its website (thank you /u/butchplz for linking).Preseason #3 Auburn ended up 8-5.Preseason #7 Oklahoma ended up 8-5.Preseason #8 Stanford ended up 8-5.Preseason #9 SCAR ended up 7-6.Preseason #10 TAMU ended up 8-5.Preseason #14 LSU ended up 8-5.Preseason #18 Michigan ended up 5-7.Preseason #19 UNC ended up 6-7.Preseason #21 OKState ended up 7-6.Preseason #22 Florida ended up 7-5.Preseason #24 Michigan State ended up 11-2, the first big miss on the list in the other direction.Preseason #25 Texas ended up 6-7.By my count, that's 12 of the top-25 with laughably bad predictions. For Whom the Cowbell Tolls, a Mississippi State Bulldogs community. To see the preseason AP and Coaches poll for 2015, click here. But lets look at just the Pac-12 conference games-most of which have taken place over the last 3 weeks. Of course, no system will be 100 percent accurate, and every year there are teams that FPI is wrong on. We know that ESPN relies on FPI for their projections and treatment of teams. Distance traveled: Like with altitude, long travel distances only impact a handful of teams, but in the most extreme cases (say, Seattle to Miami), hosting a team with a significant travel distance is worth about half a point per game, all else equal. Burke calculates 1.3 expected points for a 1st and 10 from their own 40. Some factors point in their favor. Instead, the offense get 7 minus the expected 6.4 points teams usually score from the opponents one yard line. Projected results are based on 20,000 simulations of the rest of the season using FPI, results to date, and the remaining . Well have to see if their preseason projections or their weekly updates end up being more accurate. Which four teams should make the playoffs? Obviously no team should take any game for granted. 124. ESPN's Football Power Index (FPI) college football rankings are a measure of team strength that means to predict a team's performance. Dont forget about preseason expectations. As we learn more about the true ability of each team, FPI retroactively readjusts each game within the season using the team's latest predicted components. yeah FPI stands for Frames Per Inch. He has kept the same name despite adding two addition factors to the calculation. They flipped the favorite from the preseason on 2 games where they ended up being correct (Oregon State at Fresno State and Oregon State at Stanford) and 2 where they ended up being wrong (UW at UCLA and UW at Arizona State). Projected winner: According to ESPN's Football Power Index, Florida is projected as a comfortable favorite on the road against Ole Miss on Saturday. This is an iterative process that is constantly updating and improving itself after every game of the season. For example, an additional 5 1/2 days of rest more than your opponent is worth one point per game (all else being equal), and every additional 1,000 miles traveled more than your opponent costs you a point. In the NFL -- unlike college football or college basketball -- there are no committees, no "style points" and no subjectivity. The preseason polls might seem worthless for making predictions. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Have a question or know of other rankings that should be included? Washington State at Wisconsin. -- Returning starters on offense and defense, with special consideration given to starting quarterbacks or transfer quarterbacks with starting experience, is the second piece of information powering preseason FPI. The 2021 SEC football season kicked off last Saturday with a loaded Week 1 slate. Although team ratings provide fodder for debate, the ultimate goal of these projections is not to rate teams -- it is to predict performance going forward. Another Iron Bowl clash between No. College Football Prediction Tracker The prediction average is the average prediction of a set of computer ratings. In this game they gave Oregon State a 48.4% win probability. 33. That rating is the basis for FPIs game-level and season-level projections. FPI gives the Gators a 78.9 percent chance. It's tougher than ever for prospects to fly under the radar, but it still happens. For example, Oregon State had been the underdog to Fresno State in the preseason (48.4%), but after they beat Boise State, ESPN changed them to be the favorite (52.2%). No thanks, I'll make my predictions without data and analytics. Therefore, when FPI gives a team a 75 percent chance to win and that team loses, FPI is not necessarily wrong. A team with a 75 percent chance to win should lose one out of every four times, and if every team with a 75 percent chance to win does in fact win, the system is broken. The Auburn Tigers at No. FPI is ESPN's proprietary predictive poll - most of the big computer polls in CFB are proprietary for reference, I think Colley was the only one of the six BCS computer to disclose its formula. In one case they were in. Each team receives a score related to what is theoretically an average FBS team. But with each week that a quarterback remains healthy, the chances that he is available for subsequent weeks rise. 6 Auburn, Kirk Cousins thriving even when Redskins are not, Lonzo Ball, De'Aaron Fox meet for first time in NBA as Lakers visit Kings. The quarterback factor is adjusted for the probability that the quarterback will start, injuries, rookies, and trades. Half of their misses were when the team that won had a 40-50% chance of winning. It starts by comparing the points earned on a drive with the expected number of points based on starting field position. Like most game predictions, FPI accounts for team strength, opponent strength, and home-field advantage. Breaking down the Football Power Index (5:02), Anthony Davis fills up stat sheet against Suns, Coming off 2017 and looking ahead, it's a great time to be a Georgia fan, Lou Williams has been Stephen Curry-like of late for Clippers, Wizards have a fivesome that ranks among the best in the game, It's a great time to be the Rockets' defense, Seahawks QB Russell Wilson in MVP-caliber form. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/109828/reintroducing-espns-college-football-power-index, http://www.thepredictiontracker.com/ncaaresults.php?year=15, http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/mperformFP.htm, I wrote this regarding FPI months ago, and it still is true, "we can make limitless energy, but you can't know how or why. 15 appears inflated, for a team going through a rocky. Utah at UCLA. Brian Fremeau looks back on Week 1 in college football and puts the opening games in their proper context. 82 FPI: -3.0 Projected win-loss:. There are so many college football computer rankings. However, if you look at just the games since the the first week, the accuracy is about the same: 83.7% instead of 84.3%. Here's a closed-lab test which you cannot research directly. In the interest of transparency, below is everything you need to know about college FPI. There are a number of unique inputs into each game prediction, however, that are worth highlighting: On-field performance in previous games: Team performance is measured by expected points added per play, which helps control for the extremely fast- or slow-paced teams. Expected points added, or EPA, is a measure of success/failure that takes into account yards, turnovers, red zone efficiency and more to determine how many points each unit is contributing to the team's scoring margin. Additionally, FPI applies a capping of sorts to each of these components to minimize effects of blowout games and improve prediction accuracy. Cade Massey, a professor at the Wharton School of Business and Rufus Peabody, a professional sports gambler, have developed football rankings based on a simple idea. /u/tmart12 has a nice post about that below. Bill Connelly, SB Nations college football analytics guru, writes a preview for each and every FBS team, even New Mexico State. Fraction of games won. Ive been tracking ESPNs FPI projections throughout the season and thought that this would be a good time to take a look to see how their projections have fared so far. This committee of 13 people with backgrounds in college athletics has clear importance. Ken Massey compiles over a hundred of them on his site. [This article] (http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/109828/reintroducing-espns-college-football-power-index) gives a pretty in depth explanation. The publication been been correct on 70.4. In short, if preseason FPI, which was run retroactively to 2005, had been used with no update to predict every game over the last 10 seasons, the FPI favorite would have won 72 percent of FBS-versus-FBS games (Vegas closing line was 75 percent accurate). He is a difficult prospect to evaluate because he possesses many of the traits you see in a prototypical NFL quarterback prospect (namely his mental makeup, size, arm strength . Thunder still trying to mesh ahead of matchup at Spurs, Rams offense brings back some of the 'greatest' memories. The next paragraph is a brief explanation if you aren't familiar with FPI. Without going into all of the details for all of the teams, here is a quick summary of the current future win projections for each Pac-12 team. For example, if the offense gets the ball only a yard from the end zone, they should not get full credit for scoring the touchdown. Does anyone know or have records showing the FPI's accuracy in predicting game matchups? NFL. At one point, FPI had Mississippi as the best team in the nation, and it is currently ranking Southern Cal as the sixth best team in the nation, despite their 3-3 record. However, this is a mistake. These effects were not significant for college football. -- FPI uses four recruiting services -- ESPN, Rivals, Scouts and Phil Steele -- to measure the talent on a teams roster and add an additional piece of information about which teams are on the rise. Invest in us!" The Seminoles won the BCS title the previous year and returned Heisman winning QB Jameis Winston. The two algorithms that take margin of victory and adjust for strength of schedule perform the best and almost as well as the closing spread from the markets (61.5%). The NCAA mens basketball tournament has used a selection committee similar to the College Football Playoff committee to select the field and assign a seed to each team. Cookie Notice "He checks a lot of boxes. For example, in the 2015-2016 college football playoff, FPI listed the Oklahoma Sooners as the team with the highest chance to win the playoff at 39%, while the Clemson Tigers were listed at third highest at 17%. Penn State has moved up to No. The reason they don't explain it is then anybody could use it and wouldn't need ESPN, i have no idea what it is or how it works, but it has Baylor ranked #2, so it must be excellent. WSU had just a 11.2% win probability. The ratings and projections will be updated on a daily. FPI represents how many points . Correctly predicting game outcomes cant be done by evaluating teams records because some teams are stronger than their records indicate (lots of close losses), and others have favorable schedules. ESPN has updated its Football Power Index following the weekend's slate of games. About Saturday Down South | Ethics and Editorial Standards | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Do Not Sell My Personal Information, Other Conferences: Big Ten | ACC | Pac-12, Saturday Down South reports and comments on the news around the Southeastern Conference as well as larger college football topics. College football provides only 12 or 13 games each season to evaluate a team. +3 means the home team is favored to win by 3 points and -3 means the visitor is favored by 3 points. Alabama was listed second with a 33% chance to win the playoff. Brian Fremeau uses points per possession to evaluate teams in football. 2023 The Power Rank Inc., All rights reserved. Ive heard some Husky fans say that ESPNs FPI relies too much on the previous season. One of the key metrics is # of times David Pollack has spontaneously ejaculated when thinking about your team. To understand EPA, suppose a team has a 1st and 10 at their own 20 yard line. How does one evaluate a team in the context of which teams they have played? Can Rudy Gobert-less Jazz keep pesky Nuggets off the glass? Numbers update daily. Boise State at Oregon State. Although Penn State started off lower in the top 20 of the two major. 61 percent to 70 percent. Distance traveled: Extreme cases of long travel (e.g. Each team's FPI rating is composed of predictive offensive, defensive, and special teams value, as measured by a function of expected points added (EPA). Consider the following metrics for rankings teams. That is the reason that the one wrong projection in the 80-90% range is no longer there and why there are two wrong projections in the 90-100% range. EPA per play is a measure of efficiency that serves as the basis for how FPI evaluates individual units and quarterbacks. One last goodbye to For Whom the Cowbell Tolls, Mississippi State football game day news and notes: Bulldogs in Baton Rouge, Mississippi State news and notes: Bulldogs on road vs. LSU Tigers, College football schedule, Week 2: 11 games to watch this weekend, 4 ways to prepare for Mississippi State football vs. Arizona Wildcats, 15 things to do while Mississippi State and Memphis deal with a weather delay. They had close calls against Notre Dame, Miami and Georgia Tech. Copyright: ESPN Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. How recursive and what that formula is, though we have no clue.We know that ESPN clears its previous year FPI rankings from its website. ), TCU, Indiana, Nebraska, Rutgers, and UCF are all among other humongously wrong predictions, and the list goes on and on and on. The results on the predictive power of rankings are often surprising and counter intuitive. To put this in perspective, the team favored by the closing line in the gambling markets won 61.5% of games according to The Prediction Tracker (208-130 with no prediction in one game). UW had a 39.3% win probability before the season started. They could drive the length of the field for a touchdown for +7 points or kick a field goal for +3 points. The Colley Matrix does better than win percentage but not nearly as good as raw margin of victory. Because the FPI equation is recursive, taking previous values and recalculating new values based on those tentative values. First, Ill look at their projections before the season started (preseason predictions). To add to how bad QBR is, Mohamed Sanu the Bengals WR who runs the wildcat sometimes has attempted zero passes this season and has a QBR of 2.4. ESPN's Sports Analytics Team provides all the info you need to know about what goes into the College Football Power Index ahead of the 2016 season. Game predictions account for opponent strength, pace of play, site, travel distance, day's rest and altitude, and are used to simulate the season 10,000 times to produce season projections. Copyright 2008-2023 BroBible. "He checks a lot of boxes. Just for fun I checked out Texas' FPI predictions for the season, and all but 2 games had Texas over 50%. And to put it in perspective, their QBR ranking is also terrible. The Tennessee Titans are clinging to a 23.7 percent chance. Most likely, they use yards per play for the rushing and passing numbers. Theres a 10% chance we see the Pats and Bucs play for the Super Bowl. Soccer No system will be perfectly successful at predicting records and skill, but we do know that the reliance on this formula is almost as bad as throwing darts. This is their highest rated QBR game apparently. Except for the California-Colorado game, there is not much difference in these games between the preseason and the current projections. Here are the projections for these games including the win projections from the preseason and their current projections. The only single position that impacts FPI is the quarterback position (only NFL), as predictive QBR is added. The SEC SoS circular logic is already in full swing. Here's a closed-lab test which you cannot research directly. It seems more reasonable to wait until later in the season to look at these polls. This article looks at the rankings you should take seriously in making predictions on college football games, whether youre in a weekly pool, bet on games or just need to feel smart in front of your friends. As you can see, they did better than expected in every range except the 90-100% range, but that was off by only by a small amount. To see the top 35 college football teams in Massey-Peabody, click here. Preseason FPI debuted in 2014, and you can read more about how it performed in these recaps of the 2014 and 2015 seasons. 71 percent to 80 percent. Nah after that they added an "action plays" qualifier 1 more than Batch had. OKST. Clemson would go on and beat Oklahoma in the first round, but eventually lose to Alabama in the national championship game. For Oregon and Notre Dame, not all was lost on the first Saturday of the fall. There are 5 games this weekend. Yet over a huge sample of games, the higher seed wins more than 7 of every 10 games. Presuming ESPN is serious about the accuracy of the FPI, some of the amended rankings are questionable. FPI's record of predicting the winner of games and the winner of the spread is below. Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. (You cant just use the numbers from the table above or else youll double-count the games between Pac-12 teams.). ESPNs latest Super Bowl predictions will likely make most NFL fans angry. Whether it is the warm weather or the unfamiliarity with opposing offensive schemes, defenses have historically been at a disadvantage early in the season and have held the advantage later in the year. Seasonal effects: Over the last five seasons, offenses have contributed about 1.8 points per game to their net scoring margins in the first six weeks, but as the temperature (and offenses) cooled, the league-wide offensive EPA per game dropped to 1.0 points per game in the final six weeks of the season. As an example, consider Florida State in 2014. 69. It's a stat ESPN made up to prop up the SEC during its CFP ranking shows. Despite returning most of their starters the Rams are entering a transition season. In Week 2, we get a small taste of conference play. Be sure to check out more sports stories at BroBible here. 15 Texas at Arkansas. There are a number of other NFL power ratings out there -- FiveThirtyEight (Elo Ratings), Pro Football Reference (SRS), Jeff Sagarin and others have created systems to rate NFL teams -- but FPI has a few additional features (like incorporating quarterback injuries) that sets it apart. Brian Fremeau looks back on Week 1 in college football and puts the opening games in their proper context. Notre Dame put. Human polls from later in the season do not. FPI favorites in FBS-only gamesBy percentage chance to win QB injuries/suspensions/absence: A key differentiating factor for FPI's game-level predictions is its ability to account for quarterbacks missing games. He's accurate short and can run an offense but just isn't a . And because they update those projections each week, Ill look at how well theyve adjusted those projections (weekly predictions). Terms at draftkings.com/sportsbook. There may be a long way to go in the NFL season as were only now getting prepared to enter Week 14, but its never too early to start predicting which two teams will square off in the Super Bowl. In conjunction with the opponent adjustment, FPI uses a Bayesian regression to update each teams offense, defense and special-team components, which combine to produce the rating. Connelly provides a sense for the importance of each factor in his original article on footballs five factors. FPI, along with other metrics from ESPN, have been criticized for its inaccuracy, relying more on probabilities and less on in-game action. In general, are the core problems with FPI (or any other computer based program that includes per possession stats or margin of victory) anything more than just a sample size issue? Theres a simple trick for sorting the good from the bad rankings, and it comes from consider two ideas: strength of schedule and margin of victory. Theres no requirement for coaching experience or a background in analytics. 20 college football teams we aren't sold on in 2023, SEC Basketball Power Rankings: Mizzou shocks Tennessee, Alabama downs Auburn and more, SEC Basketball Power Rankings: Alabama stays unbeaten in SEC play, Tennessee outlasts Auburn and more, SEC Basketball Power Rankings: A new top team emerges, Alabama loses in blowout fashion, Mizzou lights it up again, Auburn (99.9 percent chance to win) vs. Alabama State, Texas A&M (88 percent) vs. Colorado (Denver), Mississippi State (36.7 percent) vs. NC State, Vanderbilt (24 percent) vs. Colorado State. Because expected points added is built on play-by-play data, its fair to say that FPI looks at every play of every game in the season. I was also curious as to how it was performing this season compared to other prediction models and, interestingly enough, it seemed to be doing a good job of picking games, although not so hot against the spread. Privacy Policy. Preseason ratings historically have their flaws, but ultimately they allow for an opponent adjustment after Week 1 and are a great tool to preview the season. TEX. . Projected rankings are based on 10,000 simulations of. These are the goals with every correspondence, which cover bets on the NFL and college football. If a starting quarterback is out (or there is a chance he will be out), FPI accounts for how much better he is than his backup, and the difference between the two is accounted for in the game-level projection. In one case they were in the expected range (90-100%), and in 2 cases they were at one end of the range (50-60% and 80-90%). but the FPI has been astonishingly accurate regarding the Vols in the past . He is a regular contributor on SportsCenter and ESPN Radio and writes weekly for ESPN Insider. Invest in us! With only a few years of data, its not possible to say anything of significance about how often a higher ranked team wins a playoff or bowl game. -- Coaching tenure is primarily a way to capture the addition of a new head coach. 81 percent to 90 percent. For the curious fans with the open mind, lets get started. Like most game predictions, FPI accounts for team strength, opponent strength and home-field advantage. As college football fans, we do not agree with every prediction or rating, but in total, FPI has proven to be accurate. Does anyone know or have records showing the FPI's accuracy in predicting game matchups? The ultimate goal of FPI is not to rank teams 1 through 128; rather, it is to correctly predict games and season outcomes. Arizona at San Diego State. Only time will tell whether the College Football Playoff committee can be as good as the selection committee for March Madness. Can Thunder's struggling D slow a better-than-ever Warriors offense? ESPN has other metrics, including Strength of Record, that can be used to identify the most deserving teams. The Panthers plan to meet with Carr again, but they're evaluating the top QB prospects, too. However, the defense declined in 2014, and Florida State no longer dominated opponents. The Football Power Index (FPI) is a measure of team strength that is meant to be the best predictor of a team's performance going forward for the rest of the season. However, combining the ballots of many humans cancels out the small errors made by each one. Odds & lines subject to change. Accuracy of ESPN FPI preseason win projections for Pac-12 teams through week 6 As you can see, so far they have been fairly consistent with their projected ranges. I think it's intentionally ambiguous to give the illusion of complexity and validity. I use a similar ensemble method in the college football rankings and predictions for members of The Power Rank, and I most often check my results with those of Massey-Peabody. It's all here for the first six playoff games. But hopefully they only miss on the UW-Oregon game! Currently there are differences in which team is favored now compared to the preseason in 7 of them: WSU at Arizona (now WSU), Arizona State at Stanford (now Stanford), Arizona State at WSU (now WSU), Oregon State at Arizona State (now Oregon State), California at Colorado (now California), WSU at Stanford (now WSU), and USC at UCLA (now USC). Jan 24th, 6:00PM. 57 percent. It would be interesting to see how this ranking stacks up against other systems, like the Sagarin rankings, Bill Connelly's S&P rankings, or Ed Feng's The Power Rank. Neither value is significantly different than for all of the games, but that will be something to watch as the season progresses. Once the season is underway, the main piece of information powering these offensive, defensive and special teams predictions is past performance from that seasons games, in terms of expected points added per game. How has ESPNs FPI done in predicting the Pac-12 games so far this season? The worst team in college football According to FPI, the worst. Expected points added on offense, defense and special teams are individually adjusted for each game based on the strength of the opposing unit faced and where the game is played. There have been 18 Pac-12 games so far. Send me an email here. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. For more information, please see our {"cookieName":"wBounce","isAggressive":false,"isSitewide":true,"hesitation":"","openAnimation":false,"exitAnimation":false,"timer":"","sensitivity":"","cookieExpire":"","cookieDomain":"","autoFire":"","isAnalyticsEnabled":true}, The Craft of Sports Betting Professionals, 1.3 expected points for a 1st and 10 from their own 40, Simple Ratings System, a least squares method for ranking teams, original article on footballs five factors, 5 insights from academic research on predicting world soccer/football matches, The ultimate guide to predictive college basketball analytics, Accurate football predictions with linear regression, The surprising truth about passing and rushing in the NFL, The Reason You Cant Avoid The Curse of Small Sample Size, The essential guide to predictive CFB rankings, How computer rankings make you smarter about sports, How to win your college football bowl pool.
What Happened To J Anthony Brown Arm,
Port St Lucie Father And Daughter Killed,
Who Does Perc Test In Arkansas,
Fear Of Closing My Eyes,
Articles E
espn fpi accuracy